ChN
ChN ChN
 
 

The Fallacy of Compounding Returns

Return
 
I often find myself discussing economic issues with my friends. Some discussions can get very technical especially with some highly technical, highly skilled friends. What I've posted below is a direct transcript of what Larry sent me regarding private pensions and compounding returns.

The case described has probably happened to millions of accounts in the US.

Mathematically, compounding returns generate huge returns over time.  If an investment grows on average 10% annually for 30 years, you get a 1700% return over that time. This is the rationale behind private pensions.  However, two facts make this highly perilous for individual investors.

Volatile returns and uneven investments

10% average return is only an average.  In fact here are the actual returns for the US markets in the last 17 years:

1991    30.47%
1992    7.62%
1993    10.08%
1994    1.32%
1995    37.58%
1996    22.96%
1997    33.36%
1998    28.58%
1999    21.04%
2000    -9.10%
2001    -11.89%
2002    -22.10%
2003    28.69%
2004    10.88%
2005    4.91%
2006    15.79%
2007    5.49%
2008    -35%

And of course, to date, the US market is about -35% for the year, which wipes out a significant amount of return.  However, an investment made in 1991 would still have turned out pretty well. But here is the first problem: people invest every year in their private pensions. Unless you get a huge inheritance and invest it all when you're young, you will never take full advantage of compounding returns.  In fact, like most people, they make more money as their career progresses, so if you just happen to be unlucky enough to work in a 30-40 year window where all the high returns happen towards the beginning and all the poor returns happen when you are able to save the most, you can end up in negative territory easily

I still believe in free market principles as long as there is transparency.  However, as you can see from this real life example, there is a pragmatic case for a minimal level of defined benefit pension insurance (i.e. public pension).


Send by Y! Send by Yahoo! Messenger
Send by Email Send by email

RSS 2.0 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!


Comments
v
28.10.2008 09:42
What are these "returns"? I don't think the interest rate was ever negative! The point with private pensions is that you have an account to which you add something each month (i.e. the amount that now goes to the public pensions would go instead to your private account) on top of which you earn interest. After 30 years this ends up as a significant amount of money (even if the interest rate given by the bank is relatively low). I'm not sure that the numbers in your post have anything to do with pensions - unless you plan to play on the stock market with your pension money!
Leave a comment
Name*
Email* (will not be displayed)
Website
Verification code*    
Email me when new comments are made here
  * required field  
 
 
Christian Nasulea
 
 
 
RSS 2.0 Feed RSS 2.0
 
My Blog by email
 
  ChN
ChN ChN
     
     

    Blogroll

    Ad Literam
    Ancuta
    Dharma
    Dondo
    Fishy
    Julie
    Maria
    Mihai
    Simona
     
     
    Add to Google
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Netvibes
    Add to News Gator
    Add to Technorati
    Add to Pluck
    Add to My MSN
     
     
     
    ChN
    ChN
    ChN
    Chameleon
      17:32 GMT on 08 Feb 2012   ChN
    ChN ChN